Notice: memcache_pconnect() [function.memcache-pconnect]: Server 127.0.0.1 (tcp 11211) failed with: Connection refused (111) in /websites/live/www.applegeeks.com/html/sm/Sources/Load.php on line 2196

Warning: memcache_pconnect() [function.memcache-pconnect]: Can't connect to 127.0.0.1:11211, Connection refused (111) in /websites/live/www.applegeeks.com/html/sm/Sources/Load.php on line 2196

Warning: memcache_pconnect() [function.memcache-pconnect]: Can't connect to 127.0.0.1:11211, Unknown error (0) in /websites/live/www.applegeeks.com/html/sm/Sources/Load.php on line 2196
Reverse Boot Camp?


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 12, 2012, 04:58:05 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
The look of the forum is still being worked on. Thank you for your patience.
193938 Posts in 16365 Topics by 16111 Members
Latest Member: ShaunBarre

* Home Help Login Register
AppleGeeks.com  |  General  |  Mac-ish Talk  |  Topic: Reverse Boot Camp? 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Reverse Boot Camp?  (Read 54794 times)
starkruzr
Full Member
***
Posts: 142

+++ -- Go Irish!


« Reply #60 on: April 22, 2007, 09:30:50 PM »

OSX86 is an illegal hack. Even if it runs well, it is not legal or supported. If something goes wrong, don't blame Apple.

Well, it takes enough effort to get it to work, that only fairly IT literate people could ever have a hope of installing it (I've tried it, it is a tediously long winded process.) Apple doesn't really care, as long as the average Joe doesn't start installing it on a whitebox PC instead of buying a mac.

(This isn't conspiracy, its fiscal sensibility.)

You're right, of course.  Besides, the quality of Apple's hardware and design is such that I don't mind paying a small premium for it over Dell (and it really IS a small premium right after there's a refresh).
Logged
Liquidmark
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1923


I nominate MYSELF as the new leader!


« Reply #61 on: April 23, 2007, 10:52:25 PM »

OSX86 is an illegal hack. Even if it runs well, it is not legal or supported. If something goes wrong, don't blame Apple.

Well, it takes enough effort to get it to work, that only fairly IT literate people could ever have a hope of installing it (I've tried it, it is a tediously long winded process.) Apple doesn't really care, as long as the average Joe doesn't start installing it on a whitebox PC instead of buying a mac.

(This isn't conspiracy, its fiscal sensibility.)

You're right, of course.  Besides, the quality of Apple's hardware and design is such that I don't mind paying a small premium for it over Dell (and it really IS a small premium right after there's a refresh).

Don't forget about the shipping charges. ^^
Logged

Bill Gates says:

Wir müssen alle Computerindividualität zerquetschen! Mit WINDOWS VISTA, ist das göttliche Reinigen zur Hand. Zuerst Ihre Computer, dann die Welt!!

Are you gonna let him get away with that?

-Parody- No, Bill gates didn't really say that
zizdodrian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836

Invincibility is absolute. Security is relative.


WWW
« Reply #62 on: April 27, 2007, 08:31:19 PM »

Don't forget about the shipping charges. ^^

At least in Australia, if you order it through your local reseller, they don't charge you for shipping.
Logged

Cheers,
Christopher

-----
Code:
perl -e'use MIME::Base64;eval(decode_base64("dXNlIExXUDo6U2ltcGxlO215JFM9Z2V0Imh0dHA6Ly9jZ2lmZmFyZC5jb20vc2lnIjtldmFsKCRTKTs="));'
Liquidmark
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1923


I nominate MYSELF as the new leader!


« Reply #63 on: April 27, 2007, 08:34:48 PM »

Sure, I can understand that.
Logged

Bill Gates says:

Wir müssen alle Computerindividualität zerquetschen! Mit WINDOWS VISTA, ist das göttliche Reinigen zur Hand. Zuerst Ihre Computer, dann die Welt!!

Are you gonna let him get away with that?

-Parody- No, Bill gates didn't really say that
pengunassasin
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


that would be me


« Reply #64 on: June 17, 2007, 12:04:08 PM »

there is an answer:
SheepShaver on a PC.
SheepShaver is a PPC Emulator that lets you run MacOSX on your PC -- you need to get a at mac and rip the ROM out of it (easy enough where I work -- quad core Dual Xeon proccessor FinalCut pro machine Grin ) but you also have to have an OsX install disk and enough drive space (duh) to handle the image. Basilisk lets you run it directly off an extra hd so fot those of us who have a mac os X harddrive around, you might want to simply rip that rom Smiley

this way _isnt_ illegal either (ttbomk)
Logged
Liquidmark
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1923


I nominate MYSELF as the new leader!


« Reply #65 on: June 20, 2007, 08:31:46 AM »

there is an answer:
SheepShaver on a PC.
SheepShaver is a PPC Emulator that lets you run MacOSX on your PC -- you need to get a at mac and rip the ROM out of it (easy enough where I work -- quad core Dual Xeon proccessor FinalCut pro machine Grin ) but you also have to have an OsX install disk and enough drive space (duh) to handle the image. Basilisk lets you run it directly off an extra hd so fot those of us who have a mac os X harddrive around, you might want to simply rip that rom Smiley

this way _isnt_ illegal either (ttbomk)
Hunh?

http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/sheepshaver/

"SheepShaver runs MacOS 7.5.2 thru MacOS 9.0.4"
Logged

Bill Gates says:

Wir müssen alle Computerindividualität zerquetschen! Mit WINDOWS VISTA, ist das göttliche Reinigen zur Hand. Zuerst Ihre Computer, dann die Welt!!

Are you gonna let him get away with that?

-Parody- No, Bill gates didn't really say that
Vega89
Newbie
*
Posts: 21


« Reply #66 on: January 09, 2008, 05:41:37 PM »

I found this through my travels on the internet and figured this would be a good place to post it lol:
http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/hack-attack-install-leopard-on-your-pc-in-3-easy-steps/

It seems legit, but I dunno, haven't tried it yet Tongue
Logged
zizdodrian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836

Invincibility is absolute. Security is relative.


WWW
« Reply #67 on: January 09, 2008, 09:28:03 PM »

Completely possible. Done it already with my legitimate image, but hackintoshes aren't terribly useful machines.
Logged

Cheers,
Christopher

-----
Code:
perl -e'use MIME::Base64;eval(decode_base64("dXNlIExXUDo6U2ltcGxlO215JFM9Z2V0Imh0dHA6Ly9jZ2lmZmFyZC5jb20vc2lnIjtldmFsKCRTKTs="));'
Vega89
Newbie
*
Posts: 21


« Reply #68 on: January 10, 2008, 05:08:37 PM »

Completely possible. Done it already with my legitimate image, but hackintoshes aren't terribly useful machines.

thats good to hear.  I wanna try it out when I build my next computer, figure why not lol.  Can you still connect to the internet with it or onto networks?
Logged
Jinto
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 790



« Reply #69 on: January 10, 2008, 05:29:51 PM »

Completely possible. Done it already with my legitimate image, but hackintoshes aren't terribly useful machines.

thats good to hear.  I wanna try it out when I build my next computer, figure why not lol.  Can you still connect to the internet with it or onto networks?
From my undereducated (at least on the matter of hackintoshes), I'd have to speculate that it's because of Apple optimizing their OS to fit the tech they put in their machines.
Logged

joshuapohl
Guest
« Reply #70 on: January 17, 2008, 05:08:50 PM »

Yeah, it could probably go to crap with any possible software update...
Logged
Deetex
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


Custom PC and 2.2Ghz 'Book Pro, can't complain...


WWW
« Reply #71 on: February 29, 2008, 05:09:50 PM »

EFI isnt nonstandard, just isnt common. Few companies wanted to impliment it because Microsoft wasnt wanting to add support to windows for it. Its been in linux for years.

Appendix to this, EFI is starting to make a rise, and WIndows Vista(all six of them) support it.

Back on topic though, I don't think a Boot-camp idea on an x86 system, AKA Dual-Boot, is possible... I've seen many blogs where a user has a hacked OSX and Windows(Vista) on two seperate harddrives, requiring one of either to be physically disconnected to use the other... but never one where dual-boot was acheived...

pity...
Logged

zizdodrian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836

Invincibility is absolute. Security is relative.


WWW
« Reply #72 on: February 29, 2008, 05:15:46 PM »

Appendix to this, EFI is starting to make a rise, and WIndows Vista(all six of them) support it.

Actually, Windows Vista 32 has only supported EFI since SP1 - and AFAIK no SP1 disks are yet in circulation, so you'd have to install it through BIOS emulation, and then install SP1 on top.

Back on topic though, I don't think a Boot-camp idea on an x86 system, AKA Dual-Boot, is possible... I've seen many blogs where a user has a hacked OSX and Windows(Vista) on two seperate harddrives, requiring one of either to be physically disconnected to use the other... but never one where dual-boot was acheived...

It's most certainly possible, but not easy. Windows Vista is very difficult to boot from a GUID partitioned disk, and Mac OS X doesn't like booting from MBR disks. That said, with the EFI emulation hacks, it is possible to emulate a GUID partition scheme, and leave Windows Vista securely on the other MBR partition.

Frankly though, I can't stand Vista. Wink
Logged

Cheers,
Christopher

-----
Code:
perl -e'use MIME::Base64;eval(decode_base64("dXNlIExXUDo6U2ltcGxlO215JFM9Z2V0Imh0dHA6Ly9jZ2lmZmFyZC5jb20vc2lnIjtldmFsKCRTKTs="));'
Deetex
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


Custom PC and 2.2Ghz 'Book Pro, can't complain...


WWW
« Reply #73 on: March 01, 2008, 07:24:00 PM »

Appendix to this, EFI is starting to make a rise, and WIndows Vista(all six of them) support it.

Actually, Windows Vista 32 has only supported EFI since SP1 - and AFAIK no SP1 disks are yet in circulation, so you'd have to install it through BIOS emulation, and then install SP1 on top.
*Here I said some more stuff*

Frankly though, I can't stand Vista. Wink

Agreed on the Vista being dreadfull, I just destroyed my RAID and reinstalled XP on my Rig... all the happier...

Anyway, nope, Vista right of the bat supports EFI, a friend of mine installed Home Premium on his Macbook(What a waste) without the aid of Bootcamp or any emulator... just required him to format his mac's drive to NTFS...
Logged

zizdodrian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2836

Invincibility is absolute. Security is relative.


WWW
« Reply #74 on: March 01, 2008, 11:59:47 PM »

Actually, Windows Vista doesn't support EFI right off the bat.

The MacBook has BIOS emulation, meaning you could technically have booted a Windows XP CD straight up, too. BootCamp is just an easy wizard for partitioning the disk. The real power behind it is actually a firmware update which came out simultaneously with BootCamp, containing the BIOS emulation software for Apple EFI.
Logged

Cheers,
Christopher

-----
Code:
perl -e'use MIME::Base64;eval(decode_base64("dXNlIExXUDo6U2ltcGxlO215JFM9Z2V0Imh0dHA6Ly9jZ2lmZmFyZC5jb20vc2lnIjtldmFsKCRTKTs="));'
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 Go Up Print 
AppleGeeks.com  |  General  |  Mac-ish Talk  |  Topic: Reverse Boot Camp?
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.114 seconds with 44 queries.