<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture 2</title>
	<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/</link>
	<description>Applegeeks weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kanrul</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-256488</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanrul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-256488</guid>
		<description>Man i don't know nothing about this....really...but i loved this comic....are wonderful *-*
sorry, if you don't understood, i'm brazilian and my english is a little, like we call in my contry, enferrujado ^^

have a good day people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man i don&#8217;t know nothing about this&#8230;.really&#8230;but i loved this comic&#8230;.are wonderful *-*<br />
sorry, if you don&#8217;t understood, i&#8217;m brazilian and my english is a little, like we call in my contry, enferrujado ^^</p>
<p>have a good day people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agustin</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-234774</link>
		<dc:creator>agustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-234774</guid>
		<description>Aperture definitely brought major enhancements and well worth the upgrade. I currently use Lightroom. I feel the exposure controls are just more intuitive and I really like the integration with Photoshop. Its a personal preference though. I say upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aperture definitely brought major enhancements and well worth the upgrade. I currently use Lightroom. I feel the exposure controls are just more intuitive and I really like the integration with Photoshop. Its a personal preference though. I say upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-234396</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-234396</guid>
		<description>I've used both Aperture and Lightroom, and I have discussed this with a few professional photographers - the final choice has always been Lightroom. It is better organized and has better tools. The main problem with Aperture, as with iphoto, is that all the pictures are held within a single database, where has Lightroom makes it easy to separate databases, pictures, and the like.

Aperture is pretty cool looking and has some neat tools (like the loupe) but I think Lightroom is better over-all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used both Aperture and Lightroom, and I have discussed this with a few professional photographers - the final choice has always been Lightroom. It is better organized and has better tools. The main problem with Aperture, as with iphoto, is that all the pictures are held within a single database, where has Lightroom makes it easy to separate databases, pictures, and the like.</p>
<p>Aperture is pretty cool looking and has some neat tools (like the loupe) but I think Lightroom is better over-all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Los</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-234038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Los</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-234038</guid>
		<description>use it all the time, I love it, especially at the price good deal if you take a lot of pictures and work with raw files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>use it all the time, I love it, especially at the price good deal if you take a lot of pictures and work with raw files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perkelton</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-234030</link>
		<dc:creator>Perkelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-234030</guid>
		<description>If you already have Aperture 1.5 there's absolutely no reasons for not updating to 2.0. Aperture 2.0 is unbelievably faster than 1.5 and it takes up a lot less dead space on the screen as they have combined both the Project, Metadata-editor and Adjustments panel into three tabs in one navigator. Cropping and straightening is now also instant and flows perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you already have Aperture 1.5 there&#8217;s absolutely no reasons for not updating to 2.0. Aperture 2.0 is unbelievably faster than 1.5 and it takes up a lot less dead space on the screen as they have combined both the Project, Metadata-editor and Adjustments panel into three tabs in one navigator. Cropping and straightening is now also instant and flows perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vernes</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233905</link>
		<dc:creator>vernes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233905</guid>
		<description>Hey, did applegeeks do an Portal/GLaDos/Aperture_Science cameo yet?
That would rock on technogeekian scale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, did applegeeks do an Portal/GLaDos/Aperture_Science cameo yet?<br />
That would rock on technogeekian scale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233746</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233746</guid>
		<description>I like it a lot,  I used 1.5 for about 9 months and loved the workflow.  2 fixes a lot of complaints I had (which were few to begin with).  It's my favorite of the organization bunch I'd suggest it to anyone I know but I think if you're going to pay 200 for it, go get some pocket wizards or flashes instead unless you LOVE  organizing pictures</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it a lot,  I used 1.5 for about 9 months and loved the workflow.  2 fixes a lot of complaints I had (which were few to begin with).  It&#8217;s my favorite of the organization bunch I&#8217;d suggest it to anyone I know but I think if you&#8217;re going to pay 200 for it, go get some pocket wizards or flashes instead unless you LOVE  organizing pictures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233668</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233668</guid>
		<description>Update on the broken links to referenced files...
I was able to select all my images at once in the "all images" smart folder, and tell it where one photo was, and it sucessfully relinked all 15,000 photos even though they were in different subfolders. Took about 5 minutes to churn through it all, but it worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update on the broken links to referenced files&#8230;<br />
I was able to select all my images at once in the &#8220;all images&#8221; smart folder, and tell it where one photo was, and it sucessfully relinked all 15,000 photos even though they were in different subfolders. Took about 5 minutes to churn through it all, but it worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android 21 3/7</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233646</link>
		<dc:creator>Android 21 3/7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233646</guid>
		<description>I knew that reference had to pop up sometime!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that reference had to pop up sometime!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zenmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233541</link>
		<dc:creator>zenmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2008/04/16/aperture-2/#comment-233541</guid>
		<description>Aperture 2 is great, the speed upgrade is especially noticeable on a MBP. I had gotten pretty accustomed to the old interface so there was an adjustment period, though onlly when not running full screen mode. Well worth the price of admission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aperture 2 is great, the speed upgrade is especially noticeable on a MBP. I had gotten pretty accustomed to the old interface so there was an adjustment period, though onlly when not running full screen mode. Well worth the price of admission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
