Comments on: Issue 315 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/ Applegeeks weblog Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:28:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Ben Gowen http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2790 Ben Gowen Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:08:56 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2790 I liked the blank, round eyes. I liked the blank, round eyes.

]]> By: Stopa http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2770 Stopa Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:01:07 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2770 It just doesnt suit rest of stuff in the drawings imo. It just doesnt suit rest of stuff in the drawings imo.

]]> By: Zali http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2749 Zali Wed, 01 Nov 2006 07:50:12 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2749 Or they have and they didn't like it? I like the empty eyes when used for effect, just so long as it's not over done (no, I don't know what overdone is, I just know how to complain, deal okay?) Or they have and they didn’t like it?

I like the empty eyes when used for effect, just so long as it’s not over done (no, I don’t know what overdone is, I just know how to complain, deal okay?)

]]> By: JAQ http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2745 JAQ Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:35:39 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2745 I rather like it. It's been awesome to watch both of your styles progress since day one. (Been a hooked reader since the Hot Chocolate of course. ^^) Someone is always going to bitch. After all, the day the net was created, someone was already bitching it was too slow. ;) I rather like it. It’s been awesome to watch both of your styles progress since day one. (Been a hooked reader since the Hot Chocolate of course. ^^) Someone is always going to bitch. After all, the day the net was created, someone was already bitching it was too slow. ;)

]]> By: The Geek http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2742 The Geek Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:58:55 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2742 Obviously the people complaining about the eyes have never read the Little Orphan Annie comic. Obviously the people complaining about the eyes have never read the Little Orphan Annie comic.

]]> By: Will http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2704 Will Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:00:13 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2704 Actually I like the overall art style used for this arch. Itsl ike AG:Lite if it were as detailed as the main comic...hence why you get the no-pupil eyes. Actually I like the overall art style used for this arch. Itsl ike AG:Lite if it were as detailed as the main comic…hence why you get the no-pupil eyes.

]]> By: Jules http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2698 Jules Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:22:48 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2698 I love the style of the comic, Hawk. It's really great that you're trying out new styles. Very nice =D! Happy Halloween! I love the style of the comic, Hawk. It’s really great that you’re trying out new styles. Very nice =D!
Happy Halloween!

]]> By: Ananth Panagariya http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2695 Ananth Panagariya Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:42:02 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2695 So stick figures would be an improvement? We can do that ... So stick figures would be an improvement? We can do that …

]]> By: Johnson http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2694 Johnson Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:08:03 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2694 Because it looks not good! They look like zombies or something - stick figures seem more alive! Because it looks not good!

They look like zombies or something -
stick figures seem more alive!

]]> By: Ananth Panagariya http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/2006/10/30/issue-315/#comment-2692 Ananth Panagariya Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:23:52 +0000 http://www.applegeeks.com/blog/?p=1359#comment-2692 Why's that not good ... ? Why’s that not good … ?

]]>